In the wake of the September 2025 assassination of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk, more than 600 workers were fired, placed under investigation, or otherwise reprimanded by their employers for posting about his killing on social media. The majority had posted critical commentary, which some Republican government officials, including Vice President JD Vance and prominent right-wing influencers, encouraged their supporters to report to employers. In recent months, some of the employers that took action against their employees for their social media comments about Kirk’s killing have faced a reckoning of sorts. Some have paid out more than $1.2 million via lawsuit settlements to ex-employees fired over social media posts. (Other settlements have been unrelated to employment concerns.) That number might be eye-popping to some employers, and could have them reconsider how they respond to employees’ social media posts. “The settlements illustrate the limits employers can have in regulating their workers’ political rhetoric,” Axios reporters Avery Lotz and Rebecca Falconer wrote last month. But that may not be the case for most employers, two employment attorneys told HR Brew. For more on what HR professionals should consider, keep reading here.—PM | | |
|
|
Remember those days when you could make a learning technology buying decision all by yourself? Yeah, we can’t either. The number of stakeholders involved in learning tech decisions has gone wayyyyy up. Go1 dug into this huge change to understand what it takes to earn stakeholder buy-in from IT, finance, legal, procurement, and compliance teams. Take a peek at their new research report, The New Buying Committee, for stats like: - 88% of IT leaders, 82% of finance leaders, and 83% of legal leaders say they are more involved in learning technology decisions than they were two to three years ago.
- 77% of IT leaders, 64% of finance leaders, and 52% of legal leaders say their confidence in L&D’s ability to evaluate and manage learning tools has grown.
Read the full report to learn how to build stronger business cases + secure buy-in faster. | |
Several Pride organizations lamented the consequences of the Trump administration’s DEI crackdown in 2025, as corporate sponsors and employee resource groups backed out of parades they had participated in for over a decade. One year later, some Pride parades are continuing to face hurdles. But it appears that others are seeing signs of hope. Susanne Ford, executive director of San Francisco Pride, told HR Brew that while the organization’s parade lost several corporate sponsors in 2025, it’s only lost one—Starbucks—so far this year; others have increased their sponsorship. “We didn’t lose as many [sponsors] as we thought we were going to last year,” she said. “Last year, when we came out of it, we were behind…I think if we have a well-attended Pride and our ticket sales can increase a little bit, I think we might walk out on the other side of this better.” For more on corporate sponsorship for San Francisco Pride, keep reading here.—KP | | |
|
|
What are organizations’ biggest concerns right now? Roughly 100 HR and benefits pros were asked this question at a From Day One conference in Chicago on June 3. Three words dominated their responses: costs, AI, and wellness. “During Covid, you saw…attention from leadership around benefits…and there was a little bit of a softening of that focus over the past couple of years, but now as we see rising medical trends being so impactful to businesses’ bottom lines, cost is becoming a really big focus,” Amy Waickman, global head of benefits at Arup, told HR Brew, during the conference’s opening session. Waickman shared with HR Brew how benefits pros can address these concerns. For more from our conversation with Waickman, keep reading here.—MC | | |
|
|
Checking the candidates. As AI-driven candidate fraud grows, HR teams need to protect hiring processes and avoid wasting time on fake candidates. Persona’s starter kit for candidate fraud prevention outlines where in your hiring funnel to verify candidates, how to avoid disrupting the candidate experience, + more. Get your copy. | |
Today’s top HR reads. Stat: 60%: That’s the percentage of working parents who report that they don’t spend enough time with their children. (the New York Times) Quote: “I ignored [it] for nine months because it was in Portuguese, which I didn’t understand at the time…When I realized what opportunity was on the cards here, I jumped at it.”—Irish soccer player Roberto Lopes on a LinkedIn message he received recruiting him to play in the World Cup for Cape Verde’s national team (Business Insider) Read: Some technologists predict that by taking humans and the dated technology they rely on in the hiring process “out of the equation” and replacing them with new AI-powered tools, recruiters can actually reimagine the TA process and make it better for everyone. (the Wall Street Journal) |
|
|
We made a crossword book. It turns out the people who enjoy reading our puns enjoy solving them, too. Order now |
|
|
Share the Brew, watch your referral count climb, and unlock brag-worthy swag. Your friends get smarter. You get rewarded. Win-win. Your referral count: 5 Click to Share Or copy & paste your referral link to others: hr-brew.com/r/?kid=9ec4d467 |
|
|
|
ADVERTISE // CAREERS // SHOP // FAQ Update your email preferences or unsubscribe . View our privacy policy . Copyright © 2026 Morning Brew Inc. All rights reserved. 22 W 19th St, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10011 |
|